Is a low-carbohydrate, high-protein diet both effective and safe?
We recently reported that a low-carbohydrate
diet (Atkins-type) works for weight loss, and on average the lipid
profiles (one indication of cardiovascular risk) improved over a
six-month period. Eighty percent of the subjects [of the study]
stayed on the diet, which is remarkable. They lost an average of
10 percent of their original body weight, which is a good amount
of weight loss. However, one out of the fifty subjects had an extreme
elevation of LDL cholesterol (the "bad" cholesterol) that
warranted discontinuation of the diet.
We don't think that there is enough information to recommend this
kind of diet yet--not enough is known to be sure that the benefit
of weight loss outweighs the risks. A recent eight-week study suggested
that kidney stones might develop as a result of this type of diet.
They recommended lots of fluid intake to lessen this possibility.
This weight-loss diet, like the others, works because people consume
fewer calories than they expend during daily activities. We instructed
the subjects to eat fewer than 25 grams of carbohydrate daily. Because
we never told these subjects to decrease their calorie intake--but
they did anyway--we think that it works by appetite suppression.
As for the low-fat prescription, it is established that some low-fat
dieters have a worsening of these same lipid profiles. Maybe there
is benefit to both approaches.
--Eric C. Westman, associate professor
in the department of medicine, director of the Durham VA and Duke's
Smoking Research Lab, co-director of the Durham VA Stop Smoking
Clinic, and an ambulatory-care physician at the Durham VA Medical
Center
Reading List
While attempting to initiate an incoming
class into the intellectual life of the campus, a UNC-Chapel Hill
reading assignment generated a national debate. The contentious
text, Michael Sells' Approaching the Qu'ran, critics say, is incomplete.
In particular, Sells makes no mention of the Islamic notion of holy
war--an overly favorable, forcefully proselytizing portrayal. So,
we asked several professors what they would recommend as an informative
and objective introduction to the faith.
"In some sense, all introductory books are similar since they
treat Islamic history in a boilerplate fashion," says Ebrahim
Moosa, a professor in the religion department at Duke. "I would
recommend Islam: A Short Introduction by Abdulkader Tayob, and then
a little lower on my list is Karen Armstrong's Islam: A Short History."
Moosa says that "while most introductions deal with the history
of the tradition, they do not give you the fine grain of what it is
to live in a Muslim community." For that, he says, it's best
to rely on works by anthropologists; one that relates most closely
to our contemporary context, he says, is Mohammed Arkoun's Rethinking
Islam: Common Questions, Uncommon Answers.
Eric Meyers, director of graduate studies in religion, says that it's
long and tough going, but Albert Hourani's A History of the Arab Peoples
is well worth the effort. "He describes how the new religion
of Islam created a new world that stretched from the Atlantic to the
Indian Ocean. It has the whole picture." One might consider reading
this selectively, he adds.
Armstrong's Islam gets a second mention from Bruce Lawrence, professor
and chair of the religion department, who likes it for its maps and
figures, chronology, and glossary, since they aid in chronicling the
rise of a "remarkable and resilient civilization that dominated
the cosmopolitan world for 1,000 years--and still claims the allegiance
of 1.2 billion believers." Other more insightful books on modern
Islam are out there, he says, among them his own Shattering the Myth:
Islam Beyond Violence, but "as an introductory level text, Armstrong
commands the field."
According to Will Willimon, dean of the Chapel and professor of Christian
ministry, if you want to know about Islam, "get a copy of the
Koran in English and start reading." While it can be a challenge
to read someone else's idea of scripture, he says, "I found my
reading of the Koran to be enlightening. It's meant to be recited,
in Arabic, but if you can't do that, reading it is the next best way
to begin to understand Islam."
--compiled by Patrick Adams |