Words and Images
Editors:
I have not had time to read the article, but I have to comment on
the photos in "Letters from Afghanistan" by
Barnaby Hall, in the November-December 2002 magazine. While all the photos are
exceptional in their ability to convey the life and spirit of the
Afghan people, the cover photo is absolutely stunning. One cannot
help but compare it to the famous National Geographic cover photo
of an Afghan girl from 1985. I will read the entire article as
soon as I finish this letter.
Thank you also for "Shoo-Bee-Doo-Bee
Duke" in the same
edition. My other son (at Dickinson) is an a capella singer and he
enjoyed this article.
Nancy Bowen (Mother of Brooks Bowen '03)
(via e-mail)
Editors:
I take offense at Barnaby Hall's reference to "young U.S. punks
in uniform," and to his derogatory remarks about "U.S.
special-services" forces. I hope Professor John Richards' class
provided him more insight than he revealed from his trip. But, alas,
I read at the end of his presentation that he is from London. It's
peculiar that he didn't see any British punks or British special
forces.
Millard Vance Sales '60
Jonesboro, Arkansas
Editors:
I read Barnaby Hall's essay with great interest. His prose and pictures
gave insight into the current state of this troubled area. Truly
this is a country that has suffered much for more than a generation.
We would do well to gain knowledge and understanding of all countries
in our world.
I did find one aspect of his article to reveal much regarding the
differences between people of monetary privilege and those without.
Mr. Hall was able to visit Afghanistan due to the financial largess
of his parents. This despite the fact that he admits to being unfaithful
to their "conditions." While there, he witnessed the ravages
of Taliban rule, such as the forced use of burkhas and the desecration
of Buddhist shrines. However, when he meets the young men who helped
end the country's nightmare, Mr. Hall writes, "It is funny to
see these young U.S. Army punks in uniform driving around...." At
another point, he crosses paths with a Special Forces patrol carrying "ridiculous
amounts of guns and equipment."
Hall's condescending attitude toward, and disdain for, these young
U.S. Army soldiers is as clear as it is saddening. Maybe if their
parents had the financial means of Hall's, they too would have had
the luxury of reporting on the new Afghanistan instead of being the
means of the change.
David Ludlow M.D. '80
Spanish Fork, Utah
Editors:
I have been a faithful reader of Duke Magazine since my graduation
and have greatly enjoyed your articles. I was, however, deeply disappointed
in "Letters from Afghanistan" by
Barnaby Hall.
I, too, spent my summer in Afghanistan. However, I spent my time
there deployed as a legal adviser to CJTF-180, the military command
center north of Kabul. As I also worked as part of the team assisting
in the creation of the Afghan National Army, I spent much of my time
in Kabul as well. Mr. Hall's article can best be summed up by his
very own words in the first sentence--flippant. He approaches his "adventure" as
if it were nothing more than a spring-break trip for fun.
Afghanistan is a deeply wounded nation that is working extremely
hard to re-create itself as a modern entity. It would never have
had that chance were it not for the "young U.S. Army punks" Hall
refers to. Those "punks" and their allies fought (and are
still fighting) a difficult and dangerous war in Afghanistan. Were
it not for their efforts, Hall would never have been able to even
undertake his "adventure." In fact, had he ever made it
into Afghanistan, the former Taliban regime probably would have shot
him dead simply based on the fact that he wore shorts, took pictures
of women, saw women without their burkhas, conversed with women,
or even looked at them. The special forces he derides for having "ridiculous
amounts of guns and equipment" are the very individuals who
are risking their lives so that Afghanistan can become and remain
a free country--one that can be visited by all.
Afghanistan has struggled hard to achieve its current status; however
the job is not yet done. It is not, as Hall implies, a safe nation.
American and coalition forces are attacked on a daily basis, and
soldiers are still dying in service of our country. I'm disappointed
that you chose to publish such a superficial, flippant piece, deriding
those who are risking their lives to rebuild a nation. Next time,
please find a Duke alumnus who can provide a more realistic, serious
piece on such a key topic.
Jeanne M. Meyer '88, J.D. '92
Charlottesville, Virginia
The correspondent is an Air Force major.
Editors:
Thanks so much for Barnaby Hall's article "Letters from Afghanistan" and
breathtaking pictures. Nothing I've yet seen has brought that troubled
land in all its suffering humanity to life as this did. That it was
produced by an undergraduate student makes me particularly proud
to be associated with Duke.
Thomas P. Rausch Ph.D. '76
Los Angeles, California
Music to our Ears
Editors:
Many thanks for Neil Plakcy's article about
a capella singing on campus. In
the nearly twenty-three years since several of us founded Out of the Blue
(not twelve years ago, as reported!), string after string of exceptionally
talented singers have followed, making it the nationally acclaimed group
it is today.
Kudos to the women of Out of the Blue--and to the many other groups that have
sprung up, inspired by the joy of singing together. I enjoy basketball as much
as most alums, but these are the teams I most love to cheer for. As I approach
my twentieth reunion, few things could make me happier than knowing that good
music is alive and well at Duke.
Elisa Buono Glazer '83
Atlanta, Georgia In the November-December issue,
the name of the contributing writer behind the story "Shoo-Bee-Doo-Bee Duke" was
misspelled; the writer is Neil Plakcy. The magazine regrets the error. Value Received
Editors:
And to think I nearly crossed the alumni dues/magazine subscription line off
my 2003 "giving" budget! The November-December magazine arrived today,
and I found "myself" on three of the first six pages.
In "Between the Lines," I'm among those alumni who are neither famous
nor rich but are good and thoughtful citizens. Turning to "Face
Value," I
came eye to eye with a black face actually in charge of something, a color virtually
absent but for room cleaners and for which Duke Hospital nearly shut down the
day it "integrated the wards" while I was a student nurse.
Giving Clarence Birkhead a big grin, I turned the page to "Under
the Gargoyle" and
nearly wept at Robert Connor's notion that we, the people, have somehow gone
way past enough. When did we step from transportation to land yachts, from a
cleaned plate to needing a doggie bag, from examining our lives to following
the directions of the latest marketing scheme?
I haven't even gotten to the page that begins examining the "new nurse," a
different new nurse than I was in the old B.S.N. program. But when the letter
comes, the check will be in the mail--Duke's education and its regular communication
with all us outlanders is of continuing value.
Elaine Hydeman McNabney B.S.N. '65
(via e-mail)
Number, Please
Editors:
As a native New Yorker, I read with some amusement the statistics pertaining
to "Where Our Alumni Are," on page 62 of the November-December 2002
issue. In the left-hand list of cities, we learn that New York City, with 8,749
alumni, heads the list. Then, to the bottom right, where states are listed, we
are supposed to believe that only 7,575 alumni live in the entire state of New
York!
The last time I looked, New York City was part of New York state, so one would
assume that there would be more alumni living in the entire state than in New
York City alone. Obviously, there is an error.
Donald E. Schlesinger (via e-mail) The numbers for New York under "Major Geographic Concentrations" comprise
the metropolitan area of New York City, which includes parts of New Jersey and
Connecticut. That figure is based on geographic eligibility for DUMAA (Duke University
Metropolitan Alumni Association), the club in that region. We apologize for the
confusing listing.
Frightening
Editors:
As a historian and sometime archivist and librarian--and as a citizen--I was
enormously impressed by your lead article ["Information Lockdown"]
in the November-December 2002 issue. It is a frightening story in many ways.
Duke's stand on classified research is a principled one of which I heartily approve,
and you've set it in a broader context that is important for everyone to understand. The issue of access to information about
the books we read and the websites we visit needs to be discussed far more broadly.
I hope your article will strengthen and broaden that discussion.
Judith Austin '57 (via e-mail) |